June 2010 Archives

Phyllis's Weekly Challenge: A Good Father's Day Gift

| No TrackBacks

1.    Is there a way for the government to hold accountable the hands to which taxpayer money is given?  

2.    Women are most often characterized as the victim, and men as the abusers. What has caused this stereotype? What are some of the immediate results?

3.    Do you think there is a way to change the way society views the victim and the abuser in relation to their gender?

4.    How would you define "domestic violence?"

5.    Should the police officers be legally bound to take someone into custody each time they answer a call for help from an "abuser"?

6.    What are some of the immediate consequences of the VAWA as it currently stands?

7.    Do you think the VAWA should be reformed?

8.    If so, how would you reform the Act?

9.    Do you think women are oppressed by the "patriarchy?"

10.  How do you respond to people who make this assertion?

 

Challenge Questions:

1.  What are "civil rights?" Where does the Constitution specifically address these?

2. Research the VAWA and the history of Feminism and how each of these movements have changed gender perceptions in society. Post an article on your social networking site.

Bonus Questions:

1.    Why do you think God created differences between men and women? What do you think are some of the roles intended for each?

2.    Why do you think movements have arisen to eliminate the perception of gender differences? What have been the results of these movements?

 

 

Bookmark and Share
1. Generally, in what ways are social issues and fiscal issues linked?
2. As stated in the column, what is America's greatest social (and fiscal) issue? Why?
3. What steps would the ten-point agenda created by Usher and McManus take to preserve marriage in society?
4. How might waiting periods for both marriage and divorce impact the impoverished marriage situation in our culture?
5. Under what conditions would divorce be considered acceptable, as proposed by the ten-point agenda? Why?
6. What has been a major cause for skyrocketing rate of cohabitating couples in the past fifty years? What has our current administration done to either halt or encourage the trend?
7. How might welfare and child-support policies provide incentives for non-marriage families?
8. What has been the major cause of growth in the welfare state, and why might this be?
9. What other social problems tend to stem from the breakdown of marriage? What fiscal problems?
10. How might our federal policies shift from a welfare state to promoting a more marriage-friendly agenda?
 
Bonus:
 
Why would the the ten-point agenda call for the church (instead of the government) to take the lead in promoting marriage? Do you think the agenda has a good balance of government vs. the church promoting marriage?
 
Challenge question:
1. Research some of the effects of the welfare state upon society, and post an article on a social network.
2. Why might marriage, and not governmental support, be "one of the best routes out of poverty?"
3. How might the Constitution deal with the issue of welfare? See Article I, Section VIII. Was government intended to be a philanthropic entity? 
Bookmark and Share

Homeschoolers Learn How to Lobby

| No TrackBacks

One of the projects in which some homeschoolers participate is going to lobby at their state capitol so they can learn first-hand how our government functions.  For several years, I have known about active homeschooling groups that do this in Missouri and in Utah.  Let me tell you about the experience of a group of 14-to-18-year-old Minnesota homeschool students.  Each year, they choose a public policy topic to research, discuss, and draft mock legislative resolutions.  This year they selected the health care bill which was then making its way through Congress.

As soon as the health care bill passed, the kids got excited about the content of the bill, the way it was passed, and the back room deals.  The student leader, 18-year-old Fletcher Warren, gave a radio interview saying, "we decided that we should do what we could."  We wrote out a 3-page resolution detailing our concerns, such as the law's unconstitutionality and violation of the commerce clause.  The resolution calls on Minnesota's governor, attorney general, and state legislature to seek an injunction that would relieve the state of having to comply with newly enacted national healthcare legislation.  The 32 homeschoolers then gathered at the St. Paul, Minnesota statehouse to hand-deliver letters and copies of the signed resolution to Minnesota legislators.  The students were able to meet with four representatives and two senators, all of whom were cordial to their young constituents.

Fletcher Warren, who served as chairman of the homeschoolers' health care committee, was pleased with the way legislators received the students and message.  He described the experience of lobbying at the state capitol as "overwhelmingly positive."  The students then expanded their efforts beyond the state legislature and spoke to several of their Congressmen.  The students' lobbying trip turned out to be a good lesson in how government operates and how citizens can participate.

You can listen to this and other commentaries by Phyllis Schlafly at www.eagleforum.org/radio.

Bookmark and Share